1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1979 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 6,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Lincoln Continental (129 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 1979 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Ranger | Continental |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 6554 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5570 mm |
