1983 Ford Tempo vs. 1984 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 1984 Suzuki Alto is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Tempo (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1984 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1984 Suzuki Alto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 500 kg more than 1984 Suzuki Alto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Ford Tempo | 1984 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Tempo | Alto |
Year Released | 1983 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 59 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2160 mm |