1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Jeep CJ (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 690 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jeep CJ | 2011 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Jeep | Tata |
| Model | CJ | Nano |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2230 mm |
