1983 Zastava 102 vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan NP300 (112 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan NP300 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan NP300 (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Zastava 102 | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
| Make | Zastava | Nissan |
| Model | 102 | NP300 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 169 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2960 mm |
