1984 Abarth A 112 vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1982 kg more than 1984 Abarth A 112.
Because 2010 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Abarth A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1984 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1984 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Abarth A 112 | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 6162 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 403 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2667 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3310 mm |
