1984 Dodge Lancer vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (143 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer.
Because 2009 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Dodge Lancer | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Lancer | XF |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2910 mm |