1984 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma (90 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 18 kg more than 2010 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2010 Nissan Note | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Sigma | Note |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2600 mm |