1984 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (227 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 586 kg more than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Nissan Pulsar | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Pulsar | C30 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 227 HP |
Torque | 96 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2639 mm |