1984 Zastava 750 vs. 2010 Mazda 5

To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1984 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1984 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 5 weights approximately 912 kg more than 1984 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1984 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 5 (200 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: