1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 195 kg more than 2010 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2010 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Mazda |
| Model | Cutlass | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
