1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1968 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,899 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1968 Fiat Campagnola. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1968 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1968 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1968 Fiat Campagnola | |
| Make | Caterham | Fiat |
| Model | 1700 | Campagnola |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 38 L |
