1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1976 Skoda 110 L
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Skoda 110 L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Skoda 110 L would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1976 Skoda 110 L. (45 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1976 Skoda 110 L.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1976 Skoda 110 L | |
| Make | Caterham | Skoda |
| Model | 1700 | 110 L |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 31 L |
