1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1977 Fiat X1-9
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Fiat X1-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Fiat X1-9 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1977 Fiat X1-9. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1977 Fiat X1-9.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 1977 Fiat X1-9 | |
Make | Caterham | Fiat |
Model | 1700 | X1-9 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 50 L |