1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Caterham | Jeep |
| Model | 1700 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 82 L |
