1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2009 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2009 Fiat Siena is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2009 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Caterham | Fiat |
Model | 1700 | Siena |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 20.3:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 47 L |