1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2011 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2011 Ford Taurus is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Taurus (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2011 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 1700 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5154 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 72 L |