1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1961 Seat 600
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1961 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1961 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1961 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Camaro | 600 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |
