1986 Chrysler ES vs. 1990 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 1990 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4690 mm |