1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler ES (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler ES weights approximately 425 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (183 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
Model | ES | Covie |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 111 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 1530 mm |