1986 Ford Ranger vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 2009 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Ranger | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |