1986 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Tempo | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | Tempo | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |