1986 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. (183 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. (305 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Maserati | Jaguar |
Model | Bi Turbo | XF |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2908 mm |