1986 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mazda RX-7 | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Mazda | Citroen |
| Model | RX-7 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2354 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 246 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
