1986 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1981 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1986 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 224 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1981 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mitsubishi Colt | 1981 Toyota Cressida | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Colt | Cressida |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2650 mm |
