1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 171 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Toyota | Kia |
Model | Lite Ace | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1590 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1460 mm |