1987 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1987 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Ford Ranger | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ranger | HRT |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
