1987 Ford Tempo vs. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn
To start off, 1987 Ford Tempo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,255 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn weights approximately 725 kg more than 1987 Ford Tempo.
Because 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Tempo | 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Tempo | Silver Dawn |
Year Released | 1987 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 4255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3050 mm |