1987 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Audi RS3
To start off, 2011 Audi RS3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1987 Ford Tempo. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Tempo.
Because 2011 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Tempo. 2011 Audi RS3 has automatic transmission and 1987 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1987 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Audi RS3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Tempo | 2011 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Tempo | RS3 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automated manual |