1987 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1990 Opel Omega
To start off, 1990 Opel Omega is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Opel Omega (89 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1990 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Opel Omega (151 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 1990 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Nissan Pulsar | 1990 Opel Omega | |
Make | Nissan | Opel |
Model | Pulsar | Omega |
Year Released | 1987 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 151 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75.9 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2740 mm |