1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 1995 Plymouth Acclaim
To start off, 1995 Plymouth Acclaim is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Plymouth Acclaim is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Matra-Simca M25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Plymouth Acclaim, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Plymouth Acclaim. (183 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Plymouth Acclaim.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 1995 Plymouth Acclaim | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Plymouth |
| Model | M25 | Acclaim |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1764 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
