1989 Mercury Sable vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 385 kg more than 1989 Mercury Sable.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Mercury Sable | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Mercury | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Sable | E |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2513 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 298 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4698 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2015 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |
