1989 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1512 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1989 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
| Model | Lite Ace | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 6200 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 403 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2612 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5662 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1918 mm |
