1989 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 466 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Lite Ace | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3700 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1566 kg |
