1990 Audi 200 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (98 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi 200 (210 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (188 Nm). This means 1990 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma has automatic transmission and 1990 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1990 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Audi 200 | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | 200 | Sigma |
Year Released | 1990 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 98 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2520 mm |