1990 Chrysler ES vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1990 Chrysler ES is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler ES | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | ES | 66 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |