1990 Ford RS 200 vs. 1985 Renault 9
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1985 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1985 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Ford RS 200 | 1985 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | RS 200 | 9 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.7 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 38 L |
