1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1976 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volkswagen Polo.

Because 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Jaguar XJ6 1976 Volkswagen Polo
Make Jaguar Volkswagen
Model XJ6 Polo
Year Released 1990 1976
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3239 cc 1043 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 39 HP
Torque 299 Nm 74 Nm
Engine Bore Size 91 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83 mm 59 mm
Top Speed 217 km/hour 135 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4940 mm 3660 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2410 mm