1990 Renault Alpine vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Alpine would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Renault Alpine weights approximately 275 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1990 Renault Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Renault Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Renault Alpine | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Renault | Renault |
| Model | Alpine | Clio |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.7 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |
