1991 Ford Tempo vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1991 Ford Tempo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,305 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 62 kg more than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Tempo | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Tempo | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2305 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 85.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |
