1991 Ford Tempo vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1991 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 179 kg more than 1991 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (267 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Tempo | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | 6 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2305 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 267 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2680 mm |