1992 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2010 Toyota Camry is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 100 (277 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Camry. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 100 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Camry. (226 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 100 | 2010 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | 100 | Camry |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 277 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4806 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1471 mm |
