1992 Audi 80 vs. 2001 Ford TE-50
To start off, 2001 Ford TE-50 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford TE-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford TE-50 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford TE-50 should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford TE-50 weights approximately 396 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford TE-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford TE-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 2001 Ford TE-50 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 80 | TE-50 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 4940 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1666 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
