1992 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80. 2009 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1992 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1992 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 80 | Epica |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |