1992 Audi Coupe vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1992 Audi Coupe is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi Coupe (111 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi Coupe should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi Coupe weights approximately 220 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi Coupe (174 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Audi Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi Coupe | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | Coupe | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1992 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2380 mm |