1992 Buick Century vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Buick Century would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (118 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Buick Century. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Buick Century.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Buick Century (183 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 6. (165 Nm). This means 1992 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Buick Century | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Century | 6 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 165 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4803 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1364 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2662 mm | 2789 mm |