1992 Buick Regal vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Buick Regal would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1992 Buick Regal. (170 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1992 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1992 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Buick Regal. (298 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Buick Regal.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Buick Regal | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Regal | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 389 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 2370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3510 mm |
