1992 Ford Taurus vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1992 Ford Taurus is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Taurus (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Taurus | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Taurus | CJ2A |
Year Released | 1992 | 1949 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2040 mm |