1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2011 Peugeot 508 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot 508 (201 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 508 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Peugeot 508 (338 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm). This means 2011 Peugeot 508 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo. 2011 Peugeot 508 has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Peugeot 508 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 2011 Peugeot 508 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Tempo | 508 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 201 HP |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1853 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2817 mm |
