1992 Jaguar XJR vs. 2003 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2003 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 779 kg more than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. 1992 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2003 Lancia Ypsilon has manual transmission. 2003 Lancia Ypsilon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Jaguar XJR | 2003 Lancia Ypsilon | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lancia |
| Model | XJR | Ypsilon |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5992 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 333 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3650 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 69.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 18.1:1 |
| Top Speed | 254 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.8 seconds | 15.1 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 3.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 21.3 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 89 L | 47 L |
