1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (157 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda 626 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Mazda | Riley |
| Model | 626 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2380 mm |
